Wikipedia defines the word ‘geek’ as
‘…a slang term, noting individuals as “a peculiar or otherwise odd person, especially one who is perceived to be overly obsessed with one or more things including those of intellectuality, electronics, etc.’
But wait, it gets better…
‘…Formerly, the term referred to a carnival performer often billed as a wild man whose act usually includes biting the head off a live chicken, bat, snake or bugs.’
Mercifully, I do not remember ever biting off or wanting to bite off ‘the head of a live chicken, bat, snake or bugs’. However, I do remember many incidents that would make me eligible for the more contemporary definition of geek.
For instance, approximately a few gazillion years ago, I remember sitting in front of a fat cathode ray tube with green characters, pulling out my hair at ‘null pointer exceptions’. I was debugging my first linked list program in my high school computer lab. In Pascal.
I also remember the exhilaration when the program finally worked! The excitement when a piece of code works exactly as it is supposed to do. When every possible input is handled gracefully and the list magically creates, inserts, deletes and displays as expected. For those who cannot relate to this exhilaration, I will refer you to the aforementioned definition of geek as a possible explanation. (You probably may not be one. And I probably am.) I think that was when I decided I would code for a living. Especially if the code I wrote also helped customers save time and money.
Many moons later, the exhilaration I experienced in my school lab was a faint memory. Every now and then, I would get back in touch with the fundamental reason I got into technology, but more often than not, the dominant experience was stress. And one of the chief causes was workplace conflict. Quite often, I would find myself driving back from work, fuming about some meeting, mail thread or conversation – dissatisfied with the cause, course and outcome of a conflict.
There were times when I felt I was not assertive enough, and that my team or I were taken advantage of. There were other times when I thought I was too assertive and though I may have gotten the outcome I wanted, the collateral damage was high. Often, I paid a heavy price in terms of damaged relationships and burned bridges. There were times when I was able to steer conflicts in a way that generated the desirable outcome for all stakeholders, but I was not able to replicate this experience at will and at a high enough rate of success.
So I kept wondering if this was just the way things had to be in the fast paced, high pressure world of Technology R&D or if there was a better. I began to think that surely someone somewhere had figured out simple, repeatable techniques on handling workplace conflict constructively. It was just a matter of asking the right questions and zeroing in on the answer. The quote that kept popping up in my mind was…
“The quality of your life is determined by the quality of questions you ask.”
-Dr. John Demartini
We have a glut of easily accessible information in the world today. The right questions can help us hone in on relevant information and separate the wheat from the chaff. A series of questions kept popping up in my mind on the topic of workplace conflict.
- What are the fundamental causes of workplace conflict?
- What are the different options available while responding to a workplace conflict and how does one select the appropriate one?
- Is there a way to steer workplace conflicts in a way that maximizes the benefits and minimizes the collateral damages?
- How are my habits and tendencies preventing me from steering conflicts in the desired direction?
My journey took me on a convoluted path – from the pages of Patrick Lencioni’s ‘Death By Meeting’ and ‘The Five Dysfunctions of a Team to the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument or the TKI, the world’s best-selling assessment for understanding how different conflict-handling styles affect interpersonal and group dynamics. I made quite a few interesting discoveries as I started reading the literature on this topic. For instance, a study on the cost of work-place conflict in 9 countries states that the average US employee spends 2.8 hours per week on conflict management, adding up to $ 3.9 Billion in paid hours! Can you imagine the gains in productivity if we could use training to reduce this cost by just 5%? And this would be in addition to the reduction in stress, fatigue and damaged relationships.
As I discovered how the TKI could be applied to constructively harness conflicts in the workplace, I had two thoughts-
- First, I wished someone had told me about this earlier. Maybe 15 years ago.
- Second, I realized what a powerful dent this tool could make in workplace stress if it were to be widely used in the Technology R&D community.
Engineers like to learn from the past. As a community, most of us probably live the quote…
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
We hate repeating the same mistakes. Before we start to solve a problem, we look back at our experience to see if we have solved the same or similar problem in the past and apply the lessons we learned. When faced with a new problem, we reach out to our community to see if someone else has solved a similar one in the past, and how we can mine their experience. Whenever possible, we try not to re-invent the wheel, we just find the one that fits best and roll with it.
So what lessons can your organization learn from past conflicts? What powerful questions can you ask about conflicts to improve the direction and quality of your organization’s life? Are any of these questions relevant for you-
- Are you seeing an uptick on workplace conflict as a result of increasing layoffs, work-loads and stress in this challenging economy?
- How often have workplace conflicts caused dysfunctional relationships and interactions in your organization?
- Do workplace conflicts prevent you from experiencing the enjoyment that made you choose your profession in the first place?
- Does any of this have a negative effect on the achieving the core business goals of your organization?
- Is there a way to systematically minimize the collateral damage from work place conflict or are you doomed to settle for the luck of the draw?
If you are curious about any of these questions or if you have similar questions , the SmoothApps Online Workshop on Conflict Resolution may be worth your consideration. This workshop is a guided enquiry that helps attendees reflect on key questions like-
- What options do we have when responding to workplace conflicts?
- How do we select the most appropriate style of conflict resolution based on the situation at hand?
- How do we maximize the benefits and minimize the collateral damages from workplace conflicts?
- What are our preferred habits and tendencies with respect to managing conflict? How do they help or hurt us?
- What steps can we take to choose alternative responses when our habits prevent us from steering conflicts in the desired direction?
Contact me if you would like to share your thoughts on these topics or learn more about how SmoothApps can help you constructively harness the power of conflicts in your organization. Life is short and if there is a journey we can take to get back in touch with the exhilaration that made us choose our professions, it will be well worth our time.
Contact Us to learn how we can help you today!
Copyright 2009 SmoothApps
About Ravi Verma
Ravi Verma is a Public Speaker, Agile Coach, Professional Scrum Trainer, Evidence Based Management Consultant and Blogger with a passion for helping teams recapture the magic of making I.T.